Trunk vs LambdaTest
Trunk’s Flaky Tests is a comprehensive platform designed to detect, analyze, and manage flaky tests within your CI/CD pipeline.
Tired of clicking re-run? They were too.
Features
Notifications (GitHub, Slack, Email, etc.)
Test Framework and CI Provider Agnostic
Test Quarantining
Auto Detection
Comprehensive Dashboard
Integrated Ticketing
Detailed Failure Analysis
"Trunk's Flaky Test solution is so far the best one we've worked with, and we look forward to continuing to work with it."
"I primarily focused on the flaky tests tab and found all the information I sought. The app provided an excellent summary of our E2E pain points."
Security Overview
Your code is your IP, that’s why security and privacy are core to our design. We minimize data collection, storage, and access whenever possible. We operate using the principle of least privilege at all levels of our product and processes.
FAQs
What is Trunk Flaky Tests and how does it differ from LambdaTest?
Trunk Flaky Tests is a specialized tool designed to identify, manage, and resolve flaky tests that disrupt CI/CD pipelines. Unlike LambdaTest, which offers broader cross-browser testing capabilities, Trunk focuses specifically on flaky test management with seamless GitHub and Jira integrations. This makes Trunk particularly valuable for teams deeply embedded in GitHub workflows who need efficient issue tracking. While both tools offer auto-detection and quarantining features, Trunk's native integrations with developer workflows and free tier for open-source projects set it apart from LambdaTest's more general testing platform approach.
How does LambdaTest identify and resolve flaky tests compared to Trunk?
LambdaTest uses AI-powered Test Intelligence to identify flaky tests by analyzing patterns across historical test runs. Their system flags tests that show inconsistent results and provides analytics on flakiness trends. Trunk Flaky Tests, on the other hand, takes a more integration-focused approach by analyzing test result uploads across various frameworks and automatically creating tickets for detected flaky tests. The key difference is in how issues are resolved: LambdaTest provides the analytics but requires manual follow-up, while Trunk streamlines the entire workflow with automated ticketing and GitHub PR comments that bring flaky test information directly into developers' existing workflows.
What are the main features of LambdaTest's Test Intelligence compared to Trunk Flaky Tests?
LambdaTest's Test Intelligence focuses on AI-powered analytics that identify patterns in test failures across browsers and devices. It excels at providing visual data on flakiness trends and severity levels. Trunk Flaky Tests offers similar analytics capabilities but puts more emphasis on actionable integration features. While both platforms provide comprehensive dashboards and quarantining capabilities, Trunk adds GitHub pull request comments, integrated Jira ticketing, and webhook support that connects flaky test detection directly to your team's existing workflow. This makes Trunk more focused on streamlining the entire testing lifecycle rather than just providing analytics.
Can AI tools improve flaky test detection in testing platforms like LambdaTest and Trunk?
Yes, AI significantly enhances flaky test detection in both platforms, but with different approaches. LambdaTest leverages AI for pattern recognition across test runs, identifying subtle inconsistencies that might otherwise go unnoticed. Trunk Flaky Tests uses sophisticated algorithms to analyze test result data across frameworks, distinguishing between genuine failures and flakiness. The AI advantage comes from reducing false positives and accurately categorizing issues, saving developer time. Both platforms continue to evolve their AI capabilities, but Trunk's approach focuses more on integrating those insights directly into developer workflows through automated detection and remediation processes rather than just presenting the AI findings.
What strategies does LambdaTest provide to handle flaky tests compared to Trunk?
LambdaTest addresses flaky tests primarily through identification and analytics, offering insights into flakiness patterns across browsers and devices. Their strategy revolves around helping teams understand which tests are flaky and why. Trunk Flaky Tests takes a more comprehensive approach with its flaky test management system that goes beyond detection to include automated remediation steps. Trunk's strategy includes automatic quarantining of flaky tests to prevent CI pipeline disruptions, integrated ticketing to ensure issues are tracked, and GitHub PR comments to provide immediate feedback to developers. This end-to-end approach makes Trunk more effective for teams looking to systematically eliminate flakiness from their test suites.
How does LambdaTest integrate with CI/CD for test automation compared to Trunk?
LambdaTest offers integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and Travis CI, allowing teams to include cross-browser testing in their pipelines. However, its approach is more focused on providing a testing platform than deeply integrating with development workflows. Trunk Flaky Tests takes integration further by becoming an actual part of your CI/CD process, with features like preventing flaky tests from failing builds and providing real-time feedback through GitHub pull request comments. Trunk's deeper integration with GitHub and Jira means flaky test information flows automatically into the exact places where developers already work, reducing context switching and streamlining the entire development process.
Which tool is better for open-source projects: Trunk Flaky Tests or LambdaTest?
For open-source projects, Trunk Flaky Tests is often the better choice because it offers a free tier specifically designed for open-source repositories. This means community-driven projects can benefit from comprehensive flaky test management without incurring additional costs. LambdaTest doesn't offer comparable free services targeted at open-source development. Beyond pricing, Trunk's tight GitHub integration with PR comments provides transparent feedback that's valuable in collaborative open-source environments. The ability to automatically create tickets for flaky tests also helps distributed teams stay coordinated, making Trunk particularly well-suited for the unique challenges of open-source development while still providing enterprise-grade flaky test management.
How do Trunk Flaky Tests and LambdaTest handle test quarantining?
Both platforms offer test quarantining capabilities but with different implementations. LambdaTest allows you to mark tests as flaky and isolate them from your main test suite, but this is primarily a manual process requiring ongoing management. Trunk Flaky Tests offers more sophisticated quarantining of flaky tests that can be automated based on detection patterns. Once Trunk identifies a test as consistently flaky, it can automatically prevent that test from failing your builds while still tracking its execution results. This automated approach reduces manual overhead and prevents flaky tests from disrupting your CI pipeline without letting them fall through the cracks.
What notification options do Trunk Flaky Tests and LambdaTest offer for test failures?
Both platforms provide notification capabilities, but Trunk Flaky Tests offers more developer-centric options. LambdaTest provides email alerts and dashboard notifications when tests fail. Trunk goes further with GitHub pull request comments that bring notifications directly into code review workflows, Slack integration for team-wide awareness, and customizable webhooks for flaky test alerts that can connect to virtually any notification system. This multi-channel approach ensures that the right information reaches the right people at the right time, without requiring developers to constantly check a separate dashboard or email for updates.
How do pricing models compare between Trunk Flaky Tests and LambdaTest?
Trunk Flaky Tests and LambdaTest have distinctly different pricing approaches. LambdaTest uses a subscription model based primarily on parallel tests and minutes consumed, with plans scaling based on team size and testing volume. Trunk Flaky Tests offers a more flexible model with a generous free tier for small teams and open-source projects, then scales based on repository and organization size. The key difference is that Trunk's pricing is designed specifically for flaky test management within development workflows, while LambdaTest's pricing covers their broader cross-browser testing platform. For teams primarily concerned with managing flaky tests rather than cross-browser compatibility, Trunk often provides more focused value at a competitive price point.
What types of tests can be analyzed with LambdaTest versus Trunk Flaky Tests?
LambdaTest specializes in browser-based tests, excelling at cross-browser and cross-device testing for web applications. It supports Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and other web testing frameworks. Trunk Flaky Tests takes a more framework-agnostic approach, supporting virtually any test type across multiple languages and frameworks. While LambdaTest is optimized for web compatibility testing, Trunk handles everything from unit tests to integration tests to end-to-end tests. This broader support makes Trunk more versatile for teams with diverse testing approaches. Both platforms support the major testing frameworks, but Trunk's ability to handle custom test frameworks and virtually any test type gives it an edge for teams with complex or specialized testing needs.
Which tool provides better GitHub integration: Trunk Flaky Tests or LambdaTest?
Trunk Flaky Tests offers significantly better GitHub integration than LambdaTest. The standout feature is Trunk's automated GitHub pull request comments, which provide test flakiness information directly within code reviews. This integration means developers see flaky test data precisely where they're already working without switching contexts. Trunk also offers repository-level analytics that align with GitHub's organizational structure. While LambdaTest does offer GitHub integration for running tests, it lacks the deep workflow integration that Trunk provides. For teams heavily invested in GitHub-based development workflows, Trunk's tight integration creates a more seamless experience that keeps flaky test information visible within existing processes.
How do dashboard analytics compare between Trunk Flaky Tests and LambdaTest?
Both platforms offer comprehensive dashboards but with different focuses. LambdaTest's dashboards emphasize cross-browser compatibility metrics and test execution statistics across devices and browsers. Trunk Flaky Tests' dashboards are specifically designed for flaky test management, providing clear visibility into test health, flakiness patterns, and resolution status. Trunk's analytics are more actionable, with direct links to failing tests and historical data that help identify patterns. While LambdaTest offers good visualization of test results, Trunk's dashboard is more tightly integrated with remediation workflows. The key difference is that Trunk's analytics are designed to directly facilitate fixing flaky tests through its flaky test management approach, rather than just reporting on them.
Can LambdaTest and Trunk Flaky Tests be used together in a testing workflow?
Yes, LambdaTest and Trunk Flaky Tests can complement each other in a comprehensive testing strategy. Teams can use LambdaTest for its cross-browser testing capabilities and real device testing, while leveraging Trunk Flaky Tests for managing test flakiness across their entire test suite. This combination allows you to benefit from LambdaTest's breadth of testing environments while using Trunk's deeper workflow integration for addressing flaky tests. Since Trunk is test framework agnostic, it can analyze results from tests run through LambdaTest or any other testing platform. This integration helps teams build a robust testing approach that ensures both cross-browser compatibility and test reliability through effective flaky test management.
What support for ticketing systems do Trunk Flaky Tests and LambdaTest offer?
Trunk Flaky Tests offers native Jira integration for flaky tests, automatically creating tickets when flaky tests are detected. This integration includes bi-directional updates, so ticket status changes are reflected in Trunk's dashboard. LambdaTest offers some Jira integration capabilities but is primarily focused on test execution rather than automatic ticket creation for flaky tests. For teams using ticketing systems beyond Jira, Trunk provides webhooks for flaky test alerts that can connect to virtually any system. This deeper ticketing integration means Trunk more effectively ensures that flaky tests don't fall through the cracks and become technical debt, as each identified issue automatically enters your team's established workflow.
