Trunk vs CircleCI
Trunk’s Flaky Tests is a comprehensive platform designed to detect, analyze, and manage flaky tests within your CI/CD pipeline.
Tired of clicking re-run? They were too.
Features
Notifications (GitHub, Slack, Email, etc.)
Test Framework and CI Provider Agnostic
Test Quarantining
Auto Detection
Comprehensive Dashboard
Integrated Ticketing
Detailed Failure Analysis
"Trunk's Flaky Test solution is so far the best one we've worked with, and we look forward to continuing to work with it."
"I primarily focused on the flaky tests tab and found all the information I sought. The app provided an excellent summary of our E2E pain points."
Security Overview
Your code is your IP, that’s why security and privacy are core to our design. We minimize data collection, storage, and access whenever possible. We operate using the principle of least privilege at all levels of our product and processes.
FAQs
What are the main strategies CircleCI offers for flaky test detection and resolution?
CircleCI incorporates Test Insights to detect flaky tests by analyzing historical test data. Once identified, developers can rerun or skip these tests, although the options for handling them can be more limited compared to tools like trunk flaky tests. Trunk offers a flaky test detection that provides deeper analysis and solutions across various CI platforms.
How does CircleCI's Test Insights handle flaky tests?
CircleCI's Test Insights pinpoints tests that intermittently fail, categorizing them as flaky based on test runs. The feature allows for rerunning these tests; however, those looking for more sophisticated handling may want to explore Trunk's detailed flaky test documentation on failure analysis and management strategies.
Can CircleCI automatically rerun or skip flaky tests, and how?
Yes, CircleCI can automatically rerun certain tests identified as flaky. But here's the kicker: the options are somewhat basic, focusing on simple reruns or skips. On the other hand, Trunk not only reruns but also quarantines and analyzes flaky tests, providing a much-needed thorough inspection—almost like bringing in a detective to solve the mystery.
What are the best practices for reducing flaky tests in a CircleCI pipeline?
To combat flaky tests, CircleCI suggests practices like fine-tuning test timing, ensuring proper test isolation, and optimizing CI configurations. For those seeking a more advanced approach, Trunk provides a comprehensive guide to reducing test flakiness across CI systems that includes quarantine processes and deep failure insights—see our test quarantining process.
Does CircleCI provide integrations for notifying developers about flaky tests?
CircleCI integrates with various notification services, such as email and popular chat platforms, to inform developers about flaky tests. However, the integrations are basic compared to Trunk's offerings. Trunk Flaky Tests has robust GitHub pull request comments and Slack integration for seamless notifications.
How does Trunk Flaky Tests differ from CircleCI regarding provider agnosticism?
Trunk Flaky Tests is CI provider agnostic, meaning you can integrate it across various systems without being tied down to one. CircleCI, however, works within its own ecosystem. So, if you're juggling multiple CI pots, Trunk offers the flexibility to keep everything simmering smoothly.
Why does Trunk Flaky Tests emphasize a detailed failure analysis?
While CircleCI provides some insight into flaky tests via its platform, Trunk goes one step further with an in-depth failure analysis. This deep dive—more like an excavation—into test behaviors helps developers not only spot but solve the root causes. In essence, Trunk equips you with a magnifying glass and a map, pointing you to where the treasure of test reliability lies.
How does Trunk Quarantining handle flaky tests compared to CircleCI?
Trunk's quarantining system is like sending flaky tests to timeout while you address their failings—works with a wide range of frameworks and CI systems, thus offering a holistic approach. In contrast, CircleCI provides limited quarantine options, mainly within its environment, lacking the broader scope Trunk offers to manage these unruly tests.
What advantage does an integrated ticketing system in Trunk Flaky Tests offer?
Ever wish handling flaky tests was as easy as ticketing a bug? Well, with Trunk's integrated ticketing system, it can be. This feature streamlines workflow by automatically generating and tracking issues, merging seamlessly into your team's existing processes. Unlike CircleCI, which doesn't offer built-in ticketing, Trunk ensures you spend less time on paperwork and more on meaningful coding.
What are CircleCI’s built-in capabilities for handling flaky tests?
CircleCI has a set of built-in tools to address flaky tests within its ecosystem. Among these, Test Insights stands out for its capability to identify and advise on such tests. But remember, for specialized tasks like comprehensive failure analysis or handling flakiness across diverse CI platforms, Trunk flaky tests provide a mightier hammer.
How do Trunk Flaky Tests and CircleCI ensure compliance and security?
Trunk Flaky Tests and CircleCI both meet SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, ensuring your data is handled with top-tier security. It's like both have a certification of trustworthiness—though Trunk is your specialist in flaky test management, securing not just compliance but also the integrity of your testing cycles.
How does CircleCI identify flaky tests in pipelines?
CircleCI identifies flaky tests by analyzing patterns from previous test runs to highlight irregularities. Meanwhile, with Trunk Flaky Tests, you gain access to specific tools that provide detailed failure reasons and comprehensive flaky test detection, making the identification more precise and actionable.
