A flaky test is a software test that produces inconsistent results. One time it passes; another time it fails. These outcomes occur without any changes to the code or the test itself. This inconsistency frustrates developers and QA teams, making it hard to trust test results.
Understanding flaky tests is crucial. Developers and QA teams need reliable tests to ensure software quality. Flaky tests waste time because you can't tell if the failure is due to a bug or just the test being unreliable. This leads to more debugging, slowing down the development process.
Flaky tests also affect the end-user experience. If you can't trust your tests, bugs may slip into the final product. Users then encounter issues that should have been caught earlier. This can harm the reputation of your software.
In Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) workflows, flaky tests are a big problem. Automated testing is key in these environments. When tests are unreliable, it disrupts the whole pipeline. Deployments get delayed, and the efficiency of automated testing tools drops.
There are several misconceptions about flaky tests:
Only poorly written tests are flaky: Even well-written tests can become flaky due to external factors.
Flaky tests are rare: In reality, they are quite common, especially in complex environments.
Once fixed, tests won't become flaky again: Changes in code, dependencies, or environment can make even stable tests flaky.
Developers and QA teams need to recognize and address these misconceptions. By doing so, they can better manage flaky tests and improve the reliability of their test suites.
Why Are Flaky Tests Problematic?
Flaky tests undermine the confidence developers and QA teams have in the testing process. When you can't trust your tests, you can't trust the results. This skepticism causes hesitation in moving forward with releases. Developers spend more time re-running tests and second-guessing outcomes, which disrupts the workflow.
Flaky tests severely impact CI/CD pipeline efficiency. Automated tests are meant to speed up the development process by quickly identifying issues. When tests are unreliable, they cause false alarms and break the build. This means more manual intervention, which contradicts the purpose of automation. The pipeline becomes clogged with re-runs and manual checks, slowing down the entire system.
Potential delays in deployments and release cycles are another major issue. Flaky tests can cause unnecessary build failures. Each failed test requires investigation to determine if it's a real issue or just flakiness. This back-and-forth wastes valuable time and pushes back release dates. In a fast-paced development environment, these delays can be costly.
Identifying genuine code regressions becomes more challenging with flaky tests. When tests fail unpredictably, it becomes difficult to distinguish between real bugs and test issues. This confusion can result in overlooking actual problems. Genuine bugs may get dismissed as flaky test results, leading to more significant issues down the line. Developers need to spend extra time and effort to identify the root cause, which would have been simpler with reliable tests.
Team morale and productivity take a hit when dealing with flaky tests. Constantly dealing with unreliable tests can be frustrating. It creates a sense of instability and unpredictability in the workflow. Developers may feel demotivated, as their efforts seem wasted on debugging test issues rather than developing new features. This can lead to burnout and lower overall productivity.
In summary, flaky tests are problematic for several reasons:
Erode confidence: Unreliable tests make it hard to trust test results.
Impact CI/CD efficiency: Automated pipelines get disrupted by false alarms.
Cause delays: Investigating flaky tests wastes time, pushing back release dates.
Complicate bug detection: Genuine code regressions are harder to identify.
Lower morale: Dealing with flaky tests frustrates the team, reducing productivity.
Addressing flaky tests is essential for maintaining a smooth, efficient, and reliable development process. Recognizing their impact helps teams prioritize fixing these issues and improving the overall quality of their software.
What Causes a Flaky Test?
Poorly Written Tests
Poorly written tests often lack determinism. Determinism means that a test should produce the same result every time it runs under the same conditions. When tests are not deterministic, they can yield different outcomes, making them flaky. This inconsistency makes it difficult to know if the code is functioning correctly or if the test itself is flawed.
Another issue is making insufficient or incorrect assumptions in tests. If a test assumes certain conditions that are not always true, the test can fail unpredictably. For example, a test might assume a database state or a certain configuration that changes over time. When these assumptions don't hold, the test becomes flaky.
Async Wait Issues
Using sleep statements in tests can cause unpredictable wait times. Developers sometimes add sleep statements to wait for an application to reach a certain state. However, these fixed wait times may not always match the actual time needed for the application to respond. If the application takes longer than the sleep duration, the test will fail.
The impact of varying application response times on test results cannot be ignored. Applications might respond differently based on various factors like system load or network conditions. If a test does not account for these variations, it will produce inconsistent results. Dynamic wait conditions are necessary to handle these variations but are often overlooked, leading to flaky tests.
Test Order Dependency
Tests that depend on shared resources like files, memory, or databases can become flaky. When multiple tests use the same resources, they can interfere with each other. For example, if two tests write to the same file, the order in which they run can affect their outcomes. This dependency makes tests unreliable.
Issues arise when tests cannot run independently. Each test should set up and clean up its environment to ensure isolation. If tests depend on the results or states of other tests, they can fail when run out of order. Ensuring that each test is self-contained helps avoid these dependencies.
Concurrency Problems
Concurrency problems occur when tests make incorrect assumptions about the order of operations in multi-threaded environments. For instance, a test might assume that one thread will complete its task before another starts. If this assumption is incorrect, the test will fail inconsistently.
Misalignment between test expectations and actual code behavior is another cause of flaky tests. In multi-threaded tests, the code might execute in an order not anticipated by the test. This misalignment can lead to unpredictable test outcomes. Synchronization mechanisms or better test design are needed to address these issues.
In summary, flaky tests can arise from several causes:
Poorly Written Tests: Lack of determinism and incorrect assumptions.
Async Wait Issues: Unpredictable wait times and varying application responses.
Test Order Dependency: Shared resource dependency and lack of test independence.
Concurrency Problems: Incorrect assumptions about operation orders and misalignment with actual code behavior.
Understanding these causes helps in creating more reliable and consistent tests, improving the overall quality of the software testing process.
How to Detect Flaky Tests
Strategies for Identifying Flaky Tests by Re-running Them Multiple Times
One effective way to detect flaky tests is to re-run them multiple times. By executing the same test repeatedly under identical conditions, you can observe if the test produces inconsistent results. If a test passes sometimes and fails at other times without any changes in the code or environment, it is likely flaky. This method helps isolate tests that do not consistently reflect the state of the code.
Documenting Instances of Contradictory Test Behaviors
Documenting instances of contradictory test behaviors is crucial. Keeping a record of when and how tests fail or pass can reveal patterns. For instance, noting the specific conditions under which a test fails can help identify external factors contributing to flakiness. Detailed logs and error messages provide valuable insights into the root causes of inconsistent test results. This documentation aids in troubleshooting and understanding the nature of flaky tests.
Tools and Frameworks That Assist in Flaky Test Detection
Several tools and frameworks can assist in detecting flaky tests:
Flaky Test Handler: A plugin for JUnit that automatically retries failed tests to distinguish between flaky and consistently failing tests.
Pytest-rerunfailures: A Pytest plugin that reruns failed tests to identify flakiness.
TestNG: A testing framework for Java that offers built-in support for rerunning failed tests, helping to identify flaky tests.
These tools automate the process of detecting flaky tests by re-running them and tracking their pass/fail status over time. By using such tools, developers can quickly identify tests that exhibit flaky behavior.
Importance of Monitoring and Logging Test Executions
Monitoring and logging test executions are essential for detecting flaky tests. Continuous monitoring allows you to track the reliability of your test suite over time. Detailed logging provides a comprehensive view of test executions, capturing information about test inputs, outputs, and system states. Logs help pinpoint the exact moments when tests fail, making it easier to identify flaky tests. Consistent monitoring and logging practices ensure that flaky tests are detected early and addressed promptly.
Role of CI Visibility Platforms in Detecting Flaky Tests
CI visibility platforms play a significant role in detecting flaky tests. These platforms offer features like automatic test retries, detailed analytics, and insights into test patterns. For instance, tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI/CD, and Buildkite provide valuable metrics and data from test executions. They help surface flaky tests by analyzing test results over multiple runs. CI visibility platforms can also set alerts for new flaky tests, enabling faster investigation and remediation.
Incorporating these strategies and tools into your testing process can significantly improve your ability to detect and manage flaky tests. By re-running tests, documenting behaviors, leveraging specialized tools, and utilizing CI visibility platforms, you can maintain a robust and reliable test suite.
How to Fix a Flaky Unit Test
Use Consistent and Predictable Input Values for Tests
To fix a flaky unit test, use consistent and predictable input values. Random or variable inputs can lead to inconsistent test results. Ensure that each test runs with the same set of inputs every time. This helps to eliminate variability and makes it easier to identify true issues in the code. For example, if a test requires a random number, use a fixed number instead to maintain consistency.
Adjust Wait Times to Match Application Response Times
Adjusting wait times to match application response times is another crucial step. Sometimes, tests fail because they do not wait long enough for an application to complete a task. Instead of using fixed sleep statements, implement dynamic wait conditions that adapt to the application's response time. For instance, use explicit waits that wait for a specific condition to be met rather than a set period. This approach reduces the chances of tests failing due to timing issues.
Implement Memory Testing Tools to Check for Leaks
Memory leaks can cause tests to behave unpredictably. Implement memory testing tools to check for leaks and ensure that your application uses memory efficiently. Tools like Valgrind or AddressSanitizer can help you identify and fix memory-related issues. By addressing these leaks, you can eliminate one of the common sources of flaky tests and improve the stability of your test suite.
Ensure Tests Are Independent and Do Not Rely on External States
For tests to be reliable, they must be independent and not rely on external states. Each test should set up its environment, execute its code, and clean up afterward. Dependency on shared resources like files, databases, or memory can cause tests to fail intermittently. Isolate tests by using mock objects or stubs to simulate external dependencies. This ensures that tests do not interfere with each other and can run in any order without issues.
Regularly Review and Refactor Tests to Maintain Determinism
Regularly reviewing and refactoring your tests is essential for maintaining determinism. As your codebase evolves, some tests may become outdated or make incorrect assumptions. Periodic reviews help you identify and update such tests. Refactor tests to remove non-deterministic elements and ensure they reflect the current state of the application. This practice helps to keep your test suite robust and reduces the likelihood of flaky tests.
By following these steps, you can significantly reduce the occurrence of flaky tests and ensure that your unit tests provide reliable and consistent results.
Best Practices for Preventing Flaky Tests
Write Deterministic Tests with Clear and Correct Assumptions
Creating deterministic tests is crucial. A deterministic test produces the same result every time it runs under the same conditions. To achieve this, start by making clear and correct assumptions about what your code should do. These assumptions guide the test design, ensuring that the test will only fail when there is a genuine issue in the code. For instance, if testing a function that calculates a sum, always use fixed input values like (2, 3) expecting the result to be 5. This removes any ambiguity and helps in identifying real problems.
Avoid Hard-Coded Sleep Statements; Use Dynamic Wait Conditions
Hard-coded sleep statements are problematic. They can cause tests to either time out too soon or wait unnecessarily long, depending on the application's response time. Instead, use dynamic wait conditions that adapt to real-time conditions. For example, if you're testing a web application, use a wait mechanism that waits for a specific element to appear on the page rather than sleeping for a fixed number of seconds. This approach ensures that tests are more reliable and less prone to flakiness due to timing issues.
Ensure Tests Are Isolated and Can Run in Any Order
Test isolation is key. Each test should be able to run independently without relying on the results or states of other tests. This means avoiding shared resources like files or databases unless strictly necessary. Use techniques like mocking and stubbing to simulate these shared resources. For example, if a test requires database access, mock the database calls to return predefined data. This ensures that tests do not interfere with each other and can run in any sequence without causing failures.
Regularly Review and Update Test Suites to Adapt to Changes in the Codebase
Codebases evolve, and so should your tests. Regularly review and update your test suites to reflect changes in the application. This involves verifying that tests still make correct assumptions and removing or updating those that have become obsolete. Schedule periodic reviews to catch outdated tests early. For instance, if a function's behavior changes due to a new feature, ensure that all related tests are updated to match the new expected outcomes. Keeping your test suite current helps maintain its reliability and effectiveness.
Use Automated Tools for Continuous Monitoring and Test Retries
Leverage automated tools for continuous monitoring and test retries. Automated tools can help identify flaky tests by logging test results and highlighting inconsistencies over time. They can also automatically retry failed tests to determine if a failure is due to flakiness or a genuine code issue. Tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and GitLab CI/CD offer features to track and manage flaky tests. By continuously monitoring your tests, you can quickly identify and address flaky tests, ensuring a more stable and reliable testing process.
Taking Control of Testing
Taking control of flaky tests starts with reliable detection and prevention. Trunk is building a tool to conquer flaky tests once and for all. You’ll get all of the features of the big guy's internal systems without the headache of managing it. With Trunk Flaky Tests, you’ll be able to:
Autodetect the flaky tests in your build system
See them in a dashboard across all your repos
Quarantine tests with one click or automatically
Get detailed stats to target the root cause of the problem
Get reports weekly, nightly, or instantly sent right to email and Slack
Intelligently file tickets to the right engineer
If you’re interested in getting beta access, sign up here.
